By Score More
Manchester United endured significant challenges and displayed lackluster performance, yet managed to secure a narrow 1-0 victory against Wolverhampton in their inaugural Premier League match. The decisive goal materialized in the 76th minute, an unexpected contribution from Varane, who expertly converted a precise assist from Bissaka.
In the dying moments of the game, Onana’s actions raised suspicions of a penalty, yet the referee refrained from making the call, leading to a contentious and debatable decision.
Throughout the initial half, Manchester United struggled to find their rhythm and creative spark. Consequently, Wolverhampton maintained a constant offensive threat, highlighted by Pedro Neto’s adept ability to penetrate the opposing defense and Matheus Cunha’s missed opportunities.
Only in the 37th minute did the home team manage to exert pressure, as both Luke Shaw and Antony forced impressive saves from Wolverhampton’s goalkeeper, José Sá.
Additionally, Roberto Martínez observed from Old Trafford’s stands, acknowledging strong displays from José Sá, Nélson Semedo, Pedro Neto, and Matheus Nunes. Despite moments of brilliance from Bruno Fernandes, his performance fell short of its usual standard.
In the 50th minute, Wolverhampton seized another clear chance. Matheus Nunes orchestrated a dribble, setting up Sarabia for a cross, and following Pedro Neto’s deflection, Matheus Cunha squandered a remarkable opportunity.
Wolverhampton continued to pose a more substantial threat, demonstrating the resilience of top-tier teams in challenging circumstances. Bissaka ventured into the penalty area, delivering an immaculate cross that Varane capitalized on with a powerful header, securing Manchester United’s first goal.
In the final minutes of the match, a contentious incident took place. Onana’s actions could have warranted a penalty, yet the referee refrained from consulting VAR. Instead, a yellow card was shown to Wolverhampton’s coach, O’Neil, and the match proceeded, eliciting widespread controversy due to the decision’s ambiguity.